F1 2026 half year review fans gather beneath red smoke at the Italian Grand Prix in Monza © Getty Images / Red Bull Content Pool

F1’s Half Year Numbers Are Booming. The Fan Survey Behind Them Is Built On 0.007% Of The Fanbase

31 July 2026 · 10:02 BST

Formula 1’s own half year review paints 2026 as a season of records: nearly 3.7 million people through the gates, eleven consecutive sell-outs, six new attendance records, a fanbase pushing past 830 million. Stefano Domenicali called it “fascinating” and said fans are “loving it.” Sit the numbers next to each other and a second story emerges. Hospitality guest growth is outpacing general attendance by a wide margin. Broadcast deals sit on wildly different timelines, some locked in until 2034, others barely running past 2027. And F1’s main satisfaction barometer, Fan Voice, is drawn from a panel that amounts to roughly 0.007% of that 830 million fanbase, being presented as evidence of how the wider sport feels. The report calls it momentum. Read closely, and it reads more like a sport working out how much room is left between what sells and what fans want.

F1 2026 half year review fans gather beneath red smoke at the Italian Grand Prix in Monza © Getty Images / Red Bull Content Pool
Fans gather at Monza during the 2025 Italian Grand Prix. © Getty Images / Red Bull Content Pool

Key Points: F1 2026 Half Year Review

  • 3.7 million race attendees so far in 2026, up 6% year on year, with eleven consecutive sell-outs and six new circuit attendance records; those crowds included tickets booked in 2025, before fans had seen a single lap of the new regulations
  • Hospitality guest numbers are rising sharply, up 42% in Monaco and 22% at Silverstone, with more than 60,000 hospitality guests hosted this year
  • Media rights deals span wildly different lengths, from Sky UK & Ireland locked in until 2034 down to Kayo Sports renewed only through 2027
  • Fan Voice polling shows racing satisfaction at 66% Good or Excellent this year, up from 60% last year; the panel of 60,000 fans is roughly 0.007% of F1’s claimed 830 million global audience, and the release does not explain recruitment, demographic composition or regional weighting
  • Social following has grown 19% year on year to 125 million, with 43% of the total fanbase now under 35

The Numbers F1 Wants You To See

The topline figures are not spin. Nearly 3.7 million people attended race weekends in the first half of 2026, up 6% on the same races in 2025. Every event has sold out, eleven in a row. Six circuits broke their own attendance records: Australia, Canada, Austria, Silverstone, Belgium and Hungary. Japan alone is up 18% year on year, Britain up 13%.

Worth holding those figures with one caveat, though. F1 tickets commonly go on sale months before a race, with several circuits opening sales or presales within days of the previous year’s event finishing. Those record crowds included tickets bought and paid for in 2025, before anyone had seen a single lap of the new regulations. That does not make the attendance numbers any less real. It does mean they measure anticipation for 2026 as much as they measure satisfaction with what 2026 delivered on track. The report places them within the same story of momentum, even though they do not measure the same thing.

Social growth tells the same story. 125 million followers, up 19% year on year. Video views up 54%, driven largely by TikTok. The Drivers’ Parade LEGO activation at Silverstone alone pulled 70 million views.

Broadcast numbers are strong in specific markets too. Brazil’s TV audiences have grown up to five times larger than 2025 for some races. Italy is up 27% through the British Grand Prix, a rise that coincides with two major home-market storylines: Kimi Antonelli, an Italian driver, took the championship lead in March and has held it since, and Ferrari have had a genuine resurgence this year, including Lewis Hamilton’s first win for the team. The Chinese Grand Prix audience in China more than doubled year on year.

The demographic shift is real too. 42% of the audience is now female, with women making up three-quarters of new fans. 43% of the total fanbase is under 35. Whatever else is true about this season, Formula 1 is not shrinking, and it is not aging.


The Price Of Being In The Room

Buried further down the report, past the headline attendance figures, sits a number that says something different. Hospitality guest numbers are up 42% in Monaco and 22% at Silverstone. More than 60,000 hospitality guests have been hosted across race weekends so far this year. Hospitality growth at Monaco and Silverstone is well ahead of F1’s overall 6% attendance growth. Hospitality is the premium end of the ticket market, and this report shows it growing faster than almost anything else in it.

The premium product on offer has grown alongside the guest numbers. House 44, the hospitality suite Lewis Hamilton built with Soho House inside the F1 Paddock Club, launched in 2025 and expands further for 2026, now running at nine races across four continents. Ramsay’s Garage tells a different story. The Gordon Ramsay-fronted hospitality experience inside the F1 Garage ran at ten races in 2025 but drops to just three for 2026: Britain, Spain and Qatar. The premium tier is not expanding uniformly. It is being reshaped, with some offerings growing and others being pulled back and consolidated, even as the overall hospitality guest count climbs.

F1 2026 half year review guests watch Max Verstappen at a Red Bull hospitality event in Monaco © Getty Images / Red Bull Content Pool
Guests watch Max Verstappen during a Red Bull hospitality event at the 2026 Monaco Grand Prix. © Getty Images / Red Bull Content Pool

Sell-out crowds and record attendance are good news for the sport’s health, plainly. But a hospitality market outpacing general attendance growth, alongside named, driver-branded premium products like House 44, shows where F1’s commercial attention is increasingly directed. The report proves that premium access is becoming a more important part of F1’s growth model. What it does not show is whether ordinary supporters are benefiting from that growth or increasingly being directed towards more expensive routes into the same event.


Two Very Different Timelines

The media rights section of the report reads like a broadcast landscape operating on very different renewal cycles. Sky UK & Ireland is locked in until 2034, the longest broadcast commitment in the report. Sky Italy runs to 2032. Compare that against Kayo Sports, renewed only through 2027, or beIN through 2030. ESPN LATAM sits at 2028.

Different agreements start and expire at different times for ordinary commercial reasons: market maturity, rights holder appetite, regional competition. F1 has secured nearly a decade of certainty in the UK while some of its other media partnerships run on considerably shorter horizons. The Apple partnership, still new, is the one being talked up hardest, including a first-ever simulcast with Netflix for the Canadian Grand Prix. The logic behind that deal is straightforward once you see the trade. It is US audience only. Netflix got to broadcast a live F1 race for the first time, using the Canadian Grand Prix as the vehicle, while Apple TV picked up exclusive US streaming rights to Drive to Survive Season 8 for the same weekend. Netflix gets to point to live sports credibility. Apple gets Drive to Survive viewers funnelled toward a live product they otherwise cannot watch without an Apple TV subscription. Whether that one-off arrangement becomes a repeated pattern or stays a single experiment is not something this report answers.

That decade of UK certainty cuts two ways, and the report only shows one side of it. Sky’s new deal locks in exclusive live UK and Ireland rights until 2034, reportedly worth around £1 billion. That is a huge win for F1 commercially, a near-decade of guaranteed revenue from one of its most established markets. But that same exclusivity is the reason F1 TV Pro, the direct subscription service offering onboard cameras, alternative feeds and additional coverage that fans in most other territories can buy, remains unavailable in the UK. British fans wanting that product are locked out of it entirely through official channels. A commercially excellent deal for F1 and a restrictive one for a chunk of its home fanbase are, in this case, the exact same contract.


What Fans Are Actually Saying

F1’s own Fan Voice polling rated the racing Good or Excellent 66% of the time this year, up from 60% last year. The race-by-race picture is uneven. Japan is up 30% year on year to 48%, still under half. Monaco is up 21% to 47%, also under half. Britain is down 20% on last year, a drop the report attributes to a flatter race following a more eventful 2025 edition. That framing undersells what happened. The 2026 British Grand Prix finished behind the safety car after a late Verstappen crash at Stowe, with race control’s messaging briefly suggesting a final-lap restart before the FIA confirmed the rules did not allow one. Fans did not get a green-flag finish at Silverstone, the first race to end fully behind the safety car since Monza in 2022. A drop like that has an obvious explanation sitting right there, and it is not really about the overall shape of the season. Canada, by contrast, is up 15% to 84%, and Belgium is up 24% to 61%.

F1 2026 half year review safety car leads the field during the Belgian Grand Prix at Spa © Mercedes-AMG Petronas F1 Team / Wolfgang Wilhelm
The Safety Car leads the field during the 2026 Belgian Grand Prix at Spa-Francorchamps. © Mercedes-AMG Petronas F1 Team / Wolfgang Wilhelm

That reading comes from a panel of 60,000 fans. Sample size alone does not invalidate it. A well-run panel of that size can be statistically workable. What limits it is the missing methodology. Fan Voice is described as “a true cross section of fans both new and old,” but no demographic breakdown accompanies that claim in this release, no age spread, no split between casual and hardcore viewers, no regional weighting. F1’s other major fan research product, the Global F1 Fan Survey run with Motorsport Network, is explicit about its own methodology: it draws from self-identifying, highly engaged fans who opt in via F1’s own channels, team channels and affiliated media promotion. If Fan Voice uses a similar opt-in model, the panel may skew towards fans already engaged enough to seek out F1’s official polling. The release does not provide enough methodology to determine whether that bias has been corrected through recruitment or weighting. That makes it a useful reading of engaged Fan Voice participants. It is not automatically the voice of F1’s fanbase at large.

That gap shows up in the wider conversation happening away from F1’s own polling. Across social platforms and forums, there is a visible and recurring strand of fans, some newer to the sport, some long-standing, saying their views are not being reflected in how F1 talks about its own fanbase. It proves nothing scientifically. But it is evidence that the official satisfaction score is not the only conversation taking place around the sport.

The pattern that emerges from the numbers themselves is not “fans hate the racing.” It is closer to: fans respond directly to what happens on track, race by race, and the overall improvement is real but modest. Domenicali’s framing, that people are “loving it,” is not false. It is simply the most commercially useful reading of a number that is still only around two-thirds rating the racing Good or Excellent, drawn from a panel whose recruitment and weighting are not explained in the release, in a report otherwise built around record-breaking commercial figures.


Coffee Corner Take

Start with what sits behind the F1 brand: a commercial rights operation controlled by Liberty Media, with Formula One Management handling areas including broadcasting, event promotion and sponsorship. That is the job. Not a fan committee. Not a regulator. Roughly half of F1’s central commercial revenue gets distributed back to the teams under the Concorde Agreement, a real transfer of value into the sport’s competitive infrastructure. When Domenicali talks about growing numbers, that growth funds the teams building the cars fans watch. That gets forgotten a lot. Fans often hold F1 to the standard of a governing body focused purely on the racing product, when its actual remit has always been commercial. On that measure, largely, it is doing its job well.

But doing the commercial job well does not mean the fan-facing part of that job is above scrutiny. Hospitality growth outpacing overall attendance shows where an increasing share of F1’s commercial attention is being directed. The fact some media agreements run far further into the future than others shows where F1 currently has its greatest long-term certainty. And using an unexplained 60,000-person panel as headline evidence that “people are loving it,” while the report leads with record numbers, is a choice about which story gets top billing. F1 is not being dishonest here. It is a business optimising for growth, and growth and fan satisfaction are not automatically the same target.

Fan Voice remains useful, but F1 should be clearer about what it represents. It is a reading of the people included in that panel and responding to its surveys. Without transparent recruitment and weighting data, it should not be treated as a definitive verdict from an 830-million-person global audience.

When F1 points to a fanbase that is 43% under 35, it exposes another split that does not show up in the slides: how those fans treat each other. There is another problem with talking about “the fans” as though they are one clean group. Fans themselves cannot even agree on who is allowed to count. There is a running argument online about who counts as a real fan, whether someone arrived before Drive to Survive or after it. It is a small, vocal minority doing this, but it shows up often enough to matter. It is wrong. Football has its own gatekeeping, but nobody should have to pass a history exam before their experience of an event is allowed to count. The entry point does not matter. A fan who arrived in 2024 has exactly as much standing to say the racing felt flat at Silverstone as someone who has watched since the 1990s. Gatekeeping newer fans does nothing except shrink the audience F1 has spent this entire report bragging about growing.

The same gatekeeping instinct shows up around how deeply someone follows the sport, not just when they arrived. There is a lingering idea that a real fan watches every session of every weekend live, and anything less counts for less. That idea does not hold up, and even Domenicali has said as much. Speaking to Autosport last year, he pointed out that highlights packages perform strongly on F1’s own channels: “For those of us who grew up with the current format, everything is fine as is, but there’s a large segment that only wants to see the key moments.” Catching the highlights, following a driver through social clips, dipping in and out around a busy week, none of that makes someone less of a fan. F1 already builds content for exactly that audience. Treating that audience as lesser than the ones watching every practice session live is not something the sport itself even believes.

There is an elephant in this report nobody at F1 is going to put in a slide. Growth does not run in one direction forever. Every sport that has ever boomed has eventually met a ceiling, a downturn, a generation that moves its attention somewhere else. F1 is nowhere near that point right now. But the fans finding the middle tier increasingly difficult to afford, gatekept by their own peers over when they arrived, or told that an opaque 60,000-person panel already explains how the fanbase feels, are the same fans F1 will need standing behind it whenever the numbers eventually flatten. Loyalty built during a boom is what carries a sport through the years the boom stops. Whether F1 holds onto enough of it on the way up is the question its own report never asks.





Written by Terry Widdows

Founder & Editor, Coffee Corner Motorsport

This article was independently researched and written by Coffee Corner Motorsport. All opinions, analysis, and reporting are original to the publication and not affiliated with the FIA, Formula 1, Pirelli, or any Formula 1 teams or associated rights holders. All images used are credited to their respective rights holders and provided for editorial use only.


Keep CCM Independent & Ad-Free

This coverage was built from the ground up in a shed, entirely fueled by coffee and a passion for racing. If you enjoyed the analysis and want to help keep my motorsport news 100% free and free from annoying pop-up ads, consider supporting the work. Every bit keeps the shed running.


Join the Coffee Corner Motorsport Community

Dive into full race reports, data stories, and behind-the-scenes features
across Formula 1, Formula 2, and beyond.

Explore the F1 Hub